Quote Originally Posted by Athiril View Post
Meant to say above 5230 -should- be a little better than 5219 imo. Was sending from phone.
Athiril (or anybody), is 5230 a more recent product introduction than 5219? I didn't even know it existed.

I also did my tests on Vision2 (5218), at 1600 the negatives were a bit thinner than the 5219 but the results were very similar. So I think that all of these stocks keep fairly well if properly stored.

I suspect they may be useable at higher speeds for scanning than they would be useable for analog printing.