I seem to remember that Fujifilm's recommendations using Ilford and Kodak developers were different to those two manufacturers' recommendations for the Neopan400. My recollection is that the Fujifilm recommendations suited me better.
Originally Posted by Thomas Bertilsson
Example: Fujifilm's recommendation for Neopan400, 35mm, 400 speed, Xtol 20degC, small tank, intermittent agitation: 6.25min
From Kodak's pdf for Xtol: same conditions: 8.25min
Perhaps Kodak wanted people to say the Neopan400 isn't any good because highlights blow out or something like that.