Quote Originally Posted by Vaughn View Post
I find when counting one-ansel-adams, two-ansel adams, etc, that the accuracy of my timing is well within acceptable limits...actually I tend to count slow, if anything, so that helps to take care of some of the RFailure.

Of course what one considers acceptable limits will vary a bit.
Or if you prefer, "one-mortenson, two-mortenson, three-mortenson, four-mortenson, et al"