HP5 vs Tri-X at 800
So I just finished scanning two rolls, both shot at 800 in an XA, developed at 24C in 1:50 Rodinal, one Ilford's HP5 and one Kodak's Tri-X. I was sure I was going to prefer the Tri-X but it seems to have way more grain and contrast. (I know I recently said I was looking for grain, but seriously, that was a lot)
I know the ultimate test though will be printing them and I'm planning on doing that tomorrow night.
Here's a sample of the Ilford:
And the Kodak
How do you think they compare?