My point is that it is good practice to critically question the details / theory of testing method they use or are considering using. I believe the testing results most people produce create a false sense of accuracy. They basically aren't getting what they think they are getting.
Originally Posted by AndreasT
Would you mind breaking down your testing process? You say you use 0.10 speed point. How do you test for this? Do you have a reference for the CI 0.62 that you say most published sources use this standard? Are you determining it yourself or have you chosen it based on a source?
Why are you amazed people use box speed?