In your statement, you used Haist as your source. However, you used the word "film" in place of the original word used by Haist which was "paper". This was a clear statement by a scientist which you altered and then misunderstood. So, even clear statements can be misunderstood by lay people in spite of an effort at clarity by the original scientist.
You equated film with paper. This is not correct.
Therefore, comments about clarity notwithstanding, we had a misunderstanding. You see the problem here?