Michael, it's not my proof. In fact, it's a logical fallacy. Did the sarcasm not come across?
I've been review Henry's book over the last few days. When I first read it, I didn't like how he kept referencing popular sources. Now, I think it was a smart move. Instead of simply ignoring them, he disproves their arguments. He does a great job at experimental research. I have a little trouble with some of his exposure and film speed theory and I wish he went into more detail on tone reproduction theory with the four quadrant graph, but you can't expect to agree on everything.
Last edited by Stephen Benskin; 01-23-2013 at 09:38 AM. Click to view previous post history.