yeah, i know ... but at least the camera's being used ?
Originally Posted by E. von Hoegh
rather than being a "shelf diva" ...
it's too bad the OP's lab-guy doesn't just make quick and dirty contact prints ( he is in a photo lab ?)
and make numericalizations of the prints instead of the films ... it seems the OP's main reason for wanting to "upgrade" his camera
is to accommodate his lab-guy's not wanting to deal 3x4 film because it doesn't fit in the negative holder correctly.
heck, he could just put the film in a contact printing frame, leave it out in the sun for a few hours and scan the
ephemeral sun prints ( or make cyanotypes that last forever ) ... much easier and cheaper than frankenstiening a camera ...
Last edited by jnanian; 02-12-2013 at 03:02 PM. Click to view previous post history.