• 02-15-2013 10:17 AM #0
    Sal Santamaura
    Sal Santamaura is offline

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    841
    Quote Originally Posted by Simon R Galley View Post
    ...I know it was a different support 'when quick loads came out' as we looked to provide a product and you had to have a different support ( base )...you could be correct if they reverted to the standard base...
    Thanks for your reply. My understanding that the base of QuicklLad Acros doesn't differ from the base of loose-sheet Acros is a result of observing the physical characteristics of each version, with reference to the most recent production. I can find no difference in length, width, thickness, flexibility, surface texture/gloss of the base and emulsion sides or resistance to tearing.

    I have also been able to discern no difference between the base of READYLOAD and loose sheets of 100TMX; the same "adhered to a leader and trailer" approach was used for that product.

    This is of great interest to me. Since you considered offering packet film at one time and were dissuaded by the need for a different film base, if that requirement has since been eliminated, perhaps you might look into the possibility again. A Quickload- (or READYLOAD-) compatible box of 4x5 Delta 100 would be a fantasy come true. Maybe you could obtain Fuji's now-idle (and hopefully not scrapped) QuickLoad manufacturing equipment at a very reasonable price.

    Thanks again for being so responsive.
    Last edited by Sal Santamaura; 02-15-2013 at 11:29 AM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: To add comment about QuickLoad manufacturing equipment
    Advanced reply Adv Reply   Reply With Quote Reply With Quote