Quote Originally Posted by wblynch View Post
StoneNYC, what you present is a valid point but I would say the old-shot photos are not perfect.

I found the roll of film I shot before my half-and-half roll and those were developed at the time. Compared to the 12 years later developed roll you can definitely tell the difference.

Yes, the old-shot photos can look perfectly usable, but there is degradation.

Even 40 year old found film can be processed to return usable results. But those old exposures degrade with every year they go undeveloped. They aren't losing speed they're losing strength.
Oh I'm not arguing there isn't ANY degradation I'm saying you don't need to change development times as compensation the way you do for non-exposed old film where you have to compensate both for the exposure change in speed and development times. But the difference between the two is huge, maybe 60 yo film needs dev compensation but not really for what the OP is talking about I would start at standard dev times. That's all. I do agree some degradation happens.


Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk