Quote Originally Posted by wblynch View Post
The OP, Smigsy, has 35-40 year old unprocessed film....

I hope he isn't put off by this conflict and will report back with his findings.
Yes and based on his current findings which produced practically nothing at normal dev times of 3 mins 15 secs he certainly shouldn't be conservative this week-end with his next attempt. I'd certainly go with the very long times and lower temps suggested. Better that he develops the hell out of these films to see if that works. I see no reason why sticking to normal times or only slightly longer times shouldn't produce blank films again - not what he wants.