Quote Originally Posted by Whiteymorange View Post
I shot the film (old txp 320) at box speed and let the drum rotate for about 20 minutes... got a negative that looks to the naked eye like it might be tough to print in a reasonable time but which actually printed very quickly, with good tone.
Eh, just one more thing: when you say it "looked tough to print", do you mean it was too dense (overdeveloped), or too thin (underdeveloped)? 20 minutes' rotation sound it might be too much, from what I managed to gather regarding developing times with Caffenol... So, I presume the negative looked a bit too dense, right?