Quote Originally Posted by Bill Burk View Post
Without taking away from anything else...

Is this an approximate Δ1.50? Or is a different "upper density" endpoint on logH used for the range used for the two methods? Adding 0.29 to 1.30 gives me 1.59.
Damn math! Sorry, I got a little carried away trying to make the connection. How about almost identical to the fractional gradient method.