I'll bet this is all a hoax anyway but if real.. it is a great deal for the money adn I'd snap it.. if the lenses aren't fungus eatten and the bellows are not rotted.
as for worn.. you don't know RBs as well as I do. they can be heavily used for 40 years and still considered very usable as they have so much slak in the adjutmens provided in th emechanics you can take up a 100 years of heavy wear. daily use say school photos of hunders n hundreds of fires per day. Wear?.. it's not a Hassy!. they burn out with the same amt of useage!
50s are most commonly floating element from the later non-C on up.
Hey I'd buy the dam thing as parts for that price. 2 bodies makes your CLA free. Put together a second camera n sell it?.. use one bady as parts to repair the other is it is an abused camera... still says free to me!
if the lenses are fungus eatten.. I need shutters for other better glass in my closet.. still makes it free!
this is too good to be real.. also the OP is MIA.. yeah troll!
so lets all day dream?
Hey Poly. RZs are great til they break down and they go alot faster than the mechanicals.. a broken RZ is land fill! RB can be reapired even if you ahve to file your own parts from a car bumper or leaf spring.. an old car that is!
Better shutter in RZ lenses?.. plastic disposable crap. I'd rather the old NON-C shutters.. brass and modular not riveted stamped tin junk. I laso like a nice chunk of glass not the bottom of small Coke bottle as a lens regarless of how much cheese they put on it (coatings). compare the cells n see for yourself what you are getting in the new lenses.. umm garbage!