Quote Originally Posted by Worker 11811 View Post
Yes, but read that law and I think you'll agree that a simple bare bum in a photo does not constitute child abuse.

In this case, according to the description of the photo which we were given and interpreting the summary of the law which we were shown, I think it's pretty clear that the photo lab AND the police applied that law incorrectly.

Incorrect, negligent and/or discriminatory application of a law against one person for arbitrary reasons is a redressable offense.

Yes, this is Australian law but I'll say it again. It doesn't matter if you're in Adelaide or Albuquerque. You can't just make up laws and you can't decide when to apply them. You have to go by what is written.

According to what I read, the laws in question were interpreted incorrectly, applied incorrectly and, in my opinion, they were applied NEGLIGENTLY.
I would re-read the initial description, to me it sounds like the kid was bent over and spread, and all of his bits could be seen, which would technically violate something. Either way honestly I think the OP was foolish to think this WOULDN'T happen, but I still think it sucks that it did.


~Stone | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk