Since we so easily conflate what is morally right with what is legal - a question. Is it true that I can take a photo of anything as long as I am on public property and use it for any purpose I wish but I can only take a picture of another person, anywhere, if I don't use it for commercial use (or get model release)? Can I sell a photo of another person without a model release as a work of art? I do believe one exception is that I can take a photo of a "public" person with impunity and use it for commercial use if I wish. Just checking what our society officially "approves" of. Any lawyers out there?