I agree to a point, I don't agree that a $250,000 they could use film. I've been on $2,000,000 budget films where they were shooting on a Canon 5D II and that was because they could afford to get more footage, lens options, and tighter shots with it and less expensive lighting, over a traditional film camera. (I'm an actor also so this was what the crew told me, I didn't see the financial sheets).
Originally Posted by MDR
If I were to shoot a film, and I could afford film, I would try to use as much Kodak XX as I could get away with
If I could have it specially made in 70mm, that would be even better! I would be the the George Lucas of B&W haha.
Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk