What I am saying is whose to judge and be all "back in the day" re anyone's choice of tool, be it a camera, computer, canvas, wax......

I use good o'l UNIX (invented in '69) and software that came out just the other day to solve complex analytic questions....


The artist, should he/she choose, use what is avail.....if he/she wants a 8x10 Kodak D2, that's great, a Nikon D'whatever, that's great too.....same with computers, can you solve the problem using a mainframe, that's great, a brand new piece of software/hardware, that's great too.....

Whose to judge with emotional-memory-lane that folks today are doing it right/wrong just because access is greater.....

This is a tired debate, there are two camps and its hard to understand my side for some...

Fwiw, I only use analog cameras, though I code all day for my profession, I love both.....no one can split me to favor either side and judge anyone whose on either....