Surely that is easier to do if all the information has been preserved in the negative instead of being overdeveloped and lost through blocking?
Originally Posted by Thomas Bertilsson
Those compensating developers and the semi-stand regime for the agitation make it more likely, well they do for me...
To answer the OP's question DDX is more expensive than many developers and certainly more expensive than many of the make-it-yourself recipes such as 510-PYRO, CAFFENOL (and its variants) and OBSIDIAN AQUA etc., etc. So maybe that is one reason why more people don't use or recommend DDX?