No but you did mention manipulating micro-contrast
Originally Posted by Steve Sherman
This was Geoffrey Crawley's offering on the terminology back in 1960/61 in his series of articles on Developers in the British Journal of Photography:
" Sharpness " -the overall impression of a print or projected image, measured scientifically as "acutance ", seen from normal viewing distance.
" Definition " -the extent to which fine detail is recognisably rendered in a print, etc. When acutance of fine detail is good, then definition is good.
" Acutance " -the contrast at the edge of significant detail, a scientific measurement of the density gradient at that point.
" Resolving Power " -the scientific measurement of the actual fineness of detail recordable by a lens, film, or developer, or any combination of these three.
Missing from that list is tonality as it's quite different, but essentially controlling development to get the best possible negatives with the tonal range you require to print from helps to improve or prevent the loss of fine detail which is controlled by localised micro-contrast, and in theory that fine detail can be described in the above terms.
However I fully understand that your own technique is about controlling the tonal range rather than improving sharpness & acutance, that comes as a naturarl consequence.
Last edited by Ian Grant; 10-14-2013 at 03:55 AM. Click to view previous post history.