Quote Originally Posted by NB23 View Post
Quality wise, what's the last word regarding a Rolleiflex vs. 500c+ 80mm cf?
My flex is a 3.5f xenotar but I don't care about the max aperture, more interested in the negative...

Why is that so? And how does it relate to the perceived comparison, "quality wise" between a Rolleiflex and a Hasselblad 500c (or any other Hasselblad)?
In skilled, well experienced hands any camera from a pinhole to a top-drawer Hasselblad, will deliver the results the photographer envisioned. They are, after all, only tools.