Quote Originally Posted by IanBarber View Post
Very interesting comment MDR. The bit about the V750 does worry me slightly though. Are you saying that having gone to all the trouble of capturing an analogue file, I am going to be dissapointed with the results. I have read that people do use the better scanning holder but I do not like the idea of dropping another 100 on a holder.
It's worth remembering that film was not designed to be processed digitally. It was designed to be wet-printed, and forcing it into the strait-jacket of a "digital workflow" is necessarily going to incur some compromises.
However trying to prejudge whether you are going to be disappointed is difficult if not impossible.
Perhaps it would be a good idea to find someone with some MF negatives and a 750 and seeing what the results look like for yourself?