*Shudders* Grammar Nazi..... Ugg....
Originally Posted by Ed Sukach
I was probably overzealus on comparison between Collor Digi and Color Wet. I just saw tonight a Color Print by one of moms friends that i really liked. This wasant something you could get out of 1hourphoto booths.
When i talk about Improvement i didnt refrence the existing level of quality against each other. Analog done right is superior to Digital, no questions asked. I merely apply Moores law to digi cameras and watch as they get better and better. They are STILL handicapped by phisical limitations but like all pieces of technology, they will improve.
I sense a disturbance in the Fix. As if a thousand prints suddenly cried out in pain and then were washed. :P
Originally Posted by Sean
Originally Posted by blansky
:!: :o :o :!: Thats Techie for "Holy !@#$ dude! COOL!"
True. and since the Core area of this has to scale up as negatives scale up it becomes quite expensive for the total area so i agree with your point.
Originally Posted by Jorge Oliveira
Mom shows me prints that she gets from people and im amazed at how clear they are. I can tell a 35mm negative apart from a larger negative based upon just looking at the size of grain. She got one this summer and DAM that looks good. The guys name i cant spell or pronounce right but it sounds spanish? Les sent her a BEAUTIFUL print....
I do Flash Webdesign for people, So if you would like me to make a gallery like thing to display on a website that includes buttons and sounds and all sorts of niceities that just add to the experience, im willing to do it for you. I can make em better than the photoshop autopilot thing. Just Send me a PM or Email.