in another thread i've been reading, and became bored with, a pissing contest between, apparently/according to themselves, two experienced photographers
what makes/constitutes a good photographer?
experience? lots of money earned? peer respect? self aggrandisement? lots of opinions on any vaguely photographic subject? personal enjoyment/satisfaction? confidence to tacke any photographic oppurtunity?
who decides? who chooses?
As has been said, "Can of worms" the only thing I would add....