Originally Posted by Sparky
Not to be difficult but...
I could make the argument that, indeed, his photographs are successful in all aspects of his self-crafted aesthetic and his entire work is a cohesive body of work that conforms strictly to that aesthetic and is therefore an unqualified academic success... and argue that it still does nothing for me.
All points would be valid. I can appreciate the effort (for any artist) and not like the results, agreed?
Personally, the image, presented to me in the context of "fine art" conveys elements of either a cynical, reflexive poke at the viewer (do you buy-in or don't you?) and/or a study in data structures and tensions of balance of composition.
Of course, I could be full of sh*t too...