Quote Originally Posted by Edwardv
Prohibiting photographers from taking pictures of train stations, airports, public buildings etc is a falsehood in security.
But what if that property is private? does the good of the many out weigh the good of the few? and if it does, do you agree wtih the supreme courts choice last year?

You have NO rights when it comes to private property, if you don't own it..Period, end of story...

I think by the many postings in this thread has shown that there was an uproar that didn't need to happen, part of the property in question is in facct private, part of it is public and the public prevails, which is the way it should happen.