Selling cheap was mentioned. I think that historically the majority of artists have undervalued and underpriced their work. I think that most people get into art for the love of art, for the loving of doing it. They would do it anyway if they were wealthy, but ultimatley decide to sell their work in order to live but also in order to perpetuate their art. Most hobbyist artists, who are not reliant on their art feeding them grossly undervalue their work.
I've seen many threads here where people talk about selling their work at prices that cause them to lose money. Where is the logic in that?
Last edited by Early Riser; 12-23-2006 at 08:48 PM. Click to view previous post history.