I think it fair to comment on the reported view of one museum curator given me second hand. He felt that digital color prints were archival. Well, so much for that.

Opinion is opinion, but sometimes even well meaning tests are not very good or very revealing. Kodak, Fuji and Wilhelm differ greatly in the results of their tests. And, you must remember that not one of them is truly objective.

If they were, then where is image smear publicly reported as part of the continuing comparisions of digital vs analog, and where is the reporting of RC support stability itself? These are two big issues not being properly disseminated. These issues have been tested by all manufacturers and by Wilhelm, but are not front page issues.