I'm sure I'm going to get clobbered on this...I noticed that one of tomassauerweins photos(the one with mother and child)
is no longer posted...my question is why?
the woman was no more naked than the one in cook'n...actually she's in a less suggestive pose as well.(basically)
If it's because of the daughter-you can go into a wal-mart and legally breast feed(granted you are clothed)
In my opinion the shot was not pornographic-the child(makes it close but no worse than photos I've seen in mags with a child kissing the belly of someone of who is pregnant.
Or is it a combo of mom(naked) and child

Just want to stir something up...as this is a major art/photography issue in general