• 02-21-2007 01:53 PM #0
    darinwc
    darinwc is offline
    darinwc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,948
    Send a message via AIM to darinwc Send a message via MSN to darinwc
    Quote Originally Posted by David H. Bebbington View Post
    This is true, but I think a photographer's chances of achieving artistic expression are signficantly increased if he/she is actually allowed to use some light and shade effect and differential focus. The ideal in technical photography is, as I mentioned, flat lighting, deep focus, high sharpness, in other words emotional sterility (and I speak as someone who worked professionally as a technical photographer for years!) .
    Agreed. The artistic use of lighting and focus will make or break a peice of art. Whereas a scientific documentation strives to capture the most detail possible, which pretty much defines the use of sharp focus and flat lighting.
    Last edited by darinwc; 02-21-2007 at 02:45 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    Advanced reply Adv Reply   Reply With Quote Reply With Quote