I am afraid I'll have to disagree with you...

The "look" of this image comes from:

a. the lighting (30%)

b. the format of the neg (10%)

c. the lens on the cam (15%)

d. the film developer used (10%)

e. the paper used for printing (30%)

f. the paper developer used (5%)

If you try to use the same lighting, with a Rolleiflex and a Planar (or Sonnar), develop your film in a tanning developer and print on a REAL fixed grade chlorobromide paper you'll probably get the result you want, whichever film you use. The problem is how you'll get your hands on a paper like the one I describe, since they're almost extinct...