I am afraid I'll have to disagree with you...
The "look" of this image comes from:
a. the lighting (30%)
b. the format of the neg (10%)
c. the lens on the cam (15%)
d. the film developer used (10%)
e. the paper used for printing (30%)
f. the paper developer used (5%)
If you try to use the same lighting, with a Rolleiflex and a Planar (or Sonnar), develop your film in a tanning developer and print on a REAL fixed grade chlorobromide paper you'll probably get the result you want, whichever film you use. The problem is how you'll get your hands on a paper like the one I describe, since they're almost extinct...