great images and the most informative part of your essay, as for the text i'm not sure as to the point of your article
are you ragging digital or defending 35mm?
most of your points are unexplained, ill defined assumptions
if digital capture is "vacuum cleaning" compared to 35mm, could not the same be said of 35mm capture compared to LF capture?
what do the attractive offspring of insurance salesmen have to do with your argument?