Originally Posted by Sean
A C-print describes the final process. It is not a digital/analogue issue.
From my understanding of what these folks are doing they are making real c-prints, i.e. wet processed prinfs, from digital files. If that is indeed the case, and the caveat is that I am not sure that it is, there is absolutely nothing wrong in calling the work c-print. Prints by any process, whether it be cyanotype, gum, carbon, Pt./Pd., etc. don't care and don't specify what kind of negative was used.
The great majority of c-prints being made today are from either original digital negatives or from scans of film originals.