Quote Originally Posted by Steve Smith View Post
I have no actual proof from testing but I think that the negative to lens distance is much more critical than the lens to paper distance.


Steve.
I thought that the distance neg. <> lens and the distance lens <> paper are 'reversed proportional' ( is this the right expression in English?) to each-other. So, when one of the two distances is wrong the other one is equaly wrong, or am I wrong?

Philippe