• 09-13-2009 07:53 PM #0
    David A. Goldfarb
    David A. Goldfarb is offline
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    New York, New York
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    16,709
    An advantage of shooting 4x5" and cropping to panoramic of whatever aspect ratio you like is that you get a certain amount of extra rise/fall, because you could crop your image from the top, middle, or bottom of the frame. Also, if you only occasionally shoot panoramic, then you can batch all your film together by cropping from 4x5" and you don't have to carry a bulky rollfilm back.

    It would make sense to use a rollfilm back, if you were mainly shooting panos and wanted the more convenient/less costly processing of rollfilm and rollfilm takes up less space, doesn't require loading in the dark, etc.

    Take a look at the panoramas of Art Sinsabaugh--

    http://www.indiana.edu/~iuam/online_...gh/p_main.html

    He generally used a 12x20" camera, but sometimes cropped to 3x20" and everything in between.
    Last edited by David A. Goldfarb; 09-13-2009 at 08:29 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com
    Advanced reply Adv Reply   Reply With Quote Reply With Quote