</span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Aggie @ Apr 21 2003, 07:11 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>It does need to be like you said Michael, ...

Sometimes there is enough common sense amoung attorneys to know when the evidence will kill their case and move before go on further.</td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'>
There ARE times when there is "common sense" among atorneys? My daughter is a Legal Secretary ... and she just giggled a LOT when she read that....

My daughter&#39;s fiancee is a Police Officer, and he uses a Digital Camera in his work. I&#39;m not sure whether those images are ever used as evidence or only as "tools" in the investigations ... I&#39;ll ask him when I get a chance.

Hmm ... " the negative would be necessary?" What safeguard could there be against a secondary - manipulated - negative?