Quote Originally Posted by nickrapak View Post
Here is a summary of the 1994 case: US v. Eastman Kodak Co., 63 F.3d 95 (2nd Cir. 1994)
I like this: ". . . the district court having found that the purposes of both consent decrees had been achieved and that termination of the decrees would benefit consumers."

That's great. I can almost see it: "Let's spend several tens of thousands in court to fight it and, now that we won our case, sit on our hands and implement nothing reflecting that favourable court decision."